Kagan supreme court justice
•
Elena Kagan (2010-present)
Recent Decisions bygd Justice Kagan
Biographical Data
- Birth, Residence, and Family
- Elena Kagan, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court was born in New York, New York, on April 28, 1960.
- Education
- She received an A.B., summa cum laude, in 1981 from Princeton University. She attended Worcester College, Oxford University, as Princeton's Daniel M. Sachs Graduating Fellow, and received an M. Phil. in 1983. In 1986, she earned a J.D. from Harvard lag School, graduating magna cum laude, where she was supervising editor of the Harvard lag Review.
- Government service
- She served as a law clerk to Judge Abner Mikva of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 1986-1987. She served as a law clerk to Justice Thurgood Marshall of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1987 begrepp. From 1995-1999, she was associate counsel to President Clinton and then served as deputy assistant to the President for Domestic Po
•
Elena Kagan
US Supreme Court justice since 2010
This article is about the U.S. Supreme Court justice. For the Russian writer with the same birth name, see Elena Rzhevskaya.
Elena Kagan
Official portrait, 2013
Incumbent
Assumed office
August 7, 2010Nominated by Barack Obama Preceded by John Paul Stevens In office
March 19, 2009 – May 17, 2010President Barack Obama Deputy Neal Katyal[1] Preceded by Edwin Kneedler[2] (acting) Succeeded by Neal Katyal[1] (acting) In office
July 1, 2003 – March 19, 2009Preceded by Robert Clark Succeeded by Martha Minow In office
1997–2000President Bill Clinton Preceded by Jeremy Ben-Ami[3] Succeeded by Eric Liu[4] Born (1960-04-28) April 28, 1960 (age 64)
New York City, U.S.Political party Democratic[5] Education Signature Elena Kagan (KAY-guhn;
•
Justice Elena Kagan
Selected Opinions by Justice Kagan:
Royal Canin U.S.A. v. Wullschleger (2025)Topic:Lawsuits & Legal Procedures
When an amendment to a complaint excises the federal-law claims that enabled removal, the federal court loses its supplemental jurisdiction over the related state-law claims. The case must therefore return to state court.
Moody v. NetChoice, LLC (2024)Topic:Free Speech
The First Amendment offers protection when an entity engaging in expressive activity, including compiling and curating others’ speech, is directed to accommodate messages it would prefer to exclude. Also, a state may not interfere with private actors’ speech to advance its own vision of ideological balance.
Smith v. Arizona (2024)Topic:Criminal Trials & Prosecutions
When an expert in a criminal trial conveys an absent analyst's statements in support of their opinion, and the statements provide that support only if true,